Daniel made it clear that he saw Zo have a confrontation with another person at the party. Not only did he witness it, he intervened to break it up. On the other hand, Justin portrays a party that had no major issues outside of some bickering between couples. Zo arrived at the party with Justin; Daniel came separately. When you go to a party outside of your area, you tend to stick with the people you know, no matter how outgoing you are as a person. If Zo had gotten into a confrontation that night, Justin should have been/would have been aware of it. Yet, separately, each of the three Gardner friends interviewed claim to be aware of racism in that area and even speculate about a possible scenario where Zo gets jumped. Think about this...
top of page
To see this working, head to your live site.
8 Comments
bottom of page
At a recent party, Daniel reported witnessing Zo in a confrontation that he had to break up, while Justin, who arrived with Zo, described the event as relatively calm with only minor bickering among couples. Given that people often stick with familiar friends at unfamiliar gatherings, how could Justin be unaware of a confrontation involving Zo if it was significant enough for Daniel to intervene? Considering the Gardner friends’ awareness of racism in the area and their speculation about Zo potentially being targeted, could this context explain the discrepancy in the accounts? What might this suggest about the reliability of each person’s perspective or their motivations in sharing their version of events? пескоструй киев