From what was discussed on the Unsolved Mysteries episode, I feel the autopsy was deeply flawed. Did the family happen to have another pathologist examine the body? There should have been more to this report. I understand that some of the results may be held from the public, but it seems like this was not a thorough examination.
I agree something was odd with the autopsy and yes the coroner was dismissive. The family found him in under an hour but the coroner spoke of the difficulty & “inconvenience“ (which I thought was a weird choice of word) it would be to bring a body out to that area.
the coroner is so frustrating to listen to, offers absolutely no answers, I mean you can get answers from thousand years old skeletons nowadays and he can't find anything on a well preserved one month old body??
The family has a copy. But no it won’t be published
Okay makes sense. The one thing that struck me in the doc was the interview with the coroner. He just seemed dismissive.
No toxicology reports?
Yeah I was wondering the same thing. Is there anymore information on this ^
Yeah I was wondering that. Maybe someone slipped him something to poison him.
Exactly!
From what was discussed on the Unsolved Mysteries episode, I feel the autopsy was deeply flawed. Did the family happen to have another pathologist examine the body? There should have been more to this report. I understand that some of the results may be held from the public, but it seems like this was not a thorough examination.
I agree something was odd with the autopsy and yes the coroner was dismissive. The family found him in under an hour but the coroner spoke of the difficulty & “inconvenience“ (which I thought was a weird choice of word) it would be to bring a body out to that area.
the coroner is so frustrating to listen to, offers absolutely no answers, I mean you can get answers from thousand years old skeletons nowadays and he can't find anything on a well preserved one month old body??